Skip to main content

Correction to BloombergNEF lithium mining forecast

Short correction to the @BloombergNEF lithium mining estimate, and to my I yesterday's tweet.

Instead of 712 kt of (Li), it seems that the actual mining forecast is around 240-260 Kt of Li tons. 

>>> Enough for around 30 million EVs.

BloombergNEF lithium mining and refining forecast from the article.

That being said, the key take away from yesterday's tweet is also incorrect. Lithium mining will not meet the 4,1 TWh battery manufacturing demand forecast (by BNEF), which now also seems inflated.

My earlier post based on BNEF forecast.

BNEF 07/2022 Li mining forecast seems to be quite far off from other estimates.

I was mistaken by the @paola_rojas tweet where Li  tons were used, but BNEF estimate is likely in LCE tons. If the BNEF Li mining forecast is in LCE tons, there would be no growth from 2022-2025: 

690 kt >>> 712 kt, which is untrue according to others.

Australian government predicts a domestic production growth from 335 (2022) to 470 kt LCE by 2024. 

@BloombergNEF article's AUS 2025 forecast is smaller than the AUS production last year (2022).

Australian government lithium export estimate until 2024.

LCE= Lithium carbonate equivalent (18,8% Li). 

BNEF Chile and Argentina lithium predictions make no sense either. BNEF estimates🇨🇱 164 kt and 🇦🇷39 kt respectively. Other sources 2025: 🇨🇱 250 kt LCE, 🇦🇷 175 kt LCE.

Argentina lithium production estimate.
Australian gov. world production estimate is 1087 Kt LCE by 2024. If we assume a linear growth from 2021 onwards production would be around 1260 Kt LCE 2025. That is similar to Mckinsey & Company 1400 kt LCE prediction, 2025. 
Aus gov lithium production estimate until 2024.
Mckinsey production estimate until 2030.

Many others like @GlobalXETFs expect lithium demand to be 1500 Kt LCE, 2025.

Remarks:

1. BNEF June/2022 estimate seems incorrect/ outdated

2. Lithium mining is growing rapidly but the supply is not yet guaranteed for the near future. 

>>> Let's not get ahead off ourselves.

Visa Siekkinen

Original thread: 
https://twitter.com/VisaSkn/status/1622669437957545996?s=20

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wake up, but for what?

"To have, or not to have- that is the question", like Hamlet faced the dilemma on minerals. Geological survey of Finland (GTK) and their Associate Research Professor Simon Michaux faced too, and answered: “World doesn’t have enough mineral reserves for the energy transition”. What's that all about?   Shakespeare aside, in more specific terms GTK describe in their study  that: "It is clear that there are not enough minerals in the currently reported global reserves to build just one generation of batteries for all EV’s and stationary power storage." Seems worth checking out. The report has acquired some high praises in Finnish media and social media. It has been said that: “every decision maker and citizen should read it through”. Publicity in Finnish social media. Internationally it has also got quite a lot likeminded attention from the energy transition and renewable energy skeptics alike . Publicity in international context. Simon himself has been in the Finn...
Post a Comment
Read more